On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Bill Holder <hold...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> My statements were (are) generally not based on assumptions, but rather on > how the code actually works. I don't need measurements to explain how the Most certainly Bill. I was catching up with the thread and incorrectly put my comments on your post cutting away the wrong section. I was aiming at the unfounded assumptions about CMM and CMMA in this area. I do realize your comments are based on knowing the code, which should be enough (apart from some surprises when we learn what Linux does). My apologies if I spoiled your afternoon. I owe you a very adult beverage next time we meet. -Rob -- Rob van der Heij Velocity Software http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
