On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:41:04 -0600, Bill Holder <hold...@us.ibm.com> wrot e:
>We've been tracking some issues with unexpected MDC arbiter decisions th at >this may well be an example of (it has been observed that seemingly >unrelated storage changes elsewhere can affect MDC arbiter behavior due to >the way the arbiter algorithm works), but there were also some APARs >(VM64082 and VM64510 come to mind) that could have caused some changes, I'll >have to check in to the contents of those RSUs and get back to you later. > >- Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM Endicott >======================== ========================= ======================= Thanks. If you need any more data I will happily collect it. I won't try experimenting with changing any parameters yet, but if you're aware of any changes that might be beneficial or detrimental please let m e know. Brian Nielsen
