They're both quite large - the data disks are 3 3390-27 but they both enj oy a "working vacation" in terms of activity. Some huge files get written to them every morning, then users read them all day long. The user communit y is also large, but not volatile. The CDB's take place about 3am when no
creatures are stirring, not even mice. On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:47:37 -0700, Schuh, Richard <rsc...@visa.com> wrot e: >How large and active (creating, modifying or deleting files, actively modifying permissions, adding/deleting users, etc.) are your two filepool s? > >Regards, >Richard Schuh > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System >> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of C. Lawrence Perkins >> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:39 PM >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >> Subject: Re: Control Data Backups >> >> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:52:40 -0700, Schuh, Richard >> <rsc...@visa.com> wrot= >> e: >> >> >Suppose I have two filepools called SFS1 and SFS2. Would >> having each do >> >= >> >> control data backups to the other cause problems. For >> purposes of this = >> >> discussion, assume that they would not do the backups >> concurrently and th= at neither catalogs nor filespaces share >> space on the same disks. >> > >> > >> >Regards, >> >Richard Schuh >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> I've been doing just that for 4 years. My "SFS1" and "SFS2" >> are not only= >> >> not on the same disks, they're on two different z/VM systems >> in an ISFC = >> >> collection. >> ======================== ========================= =======================
