>In the meantime, I would seriously think about removing most of the privilege
>classes
>from that guest's definition in USER DIRECT. I might be wrong, but I don't
>think z/OS
>needs all that.
It doesn't. Our z/OS guests run just fine with class G. Some of them used to
have class B to run MIA's Autoattach feature, but we replaced that with the
MULTIUSER option of DEDICATE when it became available.
Dennis O'Brien
"Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed". -- Apollo 11, 20 July
1969, Sea of Tranquility
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:12
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM
>>> On 7/21/2009 at 12:10 PM, Sergio Lima <sergiovm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
-snip-
> We have a ZOS 1.7 System here, that run in native mode, no problem, but when
> try run under Z/VM, the VTAM had a 0C4 abend.
>
> Below, the user directory entry, and the log of VTAM.
>
> USER ZOS17 ZOS17 500M 1000M ABCDEFG
-snip-
>
> Someone already saw this ?
The way to find out is to open a PMR with IBM. In the meantime, I would
seriously think about removing most of the privilege classes from that guest's
definition in USER DIRECT. I might be wrong, but I don't think z/OS needs all
that.
Mark Post
