<grin> Exactly so! -Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:02 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: z/LInux, LVM, and minor disasters. > > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 15:53, Paul.Raulerson wrote: > > Don't know what you consider a lot, but as of right now, I am pretty > well > > convinced that > > there is a bug, and a rather nasty one at that, in the LVM code. > > > > Do you do much adding and/or removal of DASD to your Linux instances? > If > > not, it would be > > interesting to hear what happens when you do try to add additional > DASD to > > the Linux guest, > > and from there on into the LVM. > > > > Perhaps it is human error. The question is where? :) > > > > -Paul > > > > I can't resist: it is definately human error. But whose error? The > likelihood that it is a hardware failure is so remote as to be > impossible. Especially if it is repeatable. > > "To err is human. To really mess up requires a computer." > > -- > John McKown > Maranatha!
