I have a secondary id;, it is the class G, unauthorized id. Regards, Richard Schuh
> -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:29 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: RSCS Messages > > Suggestion time. > > My auditors always had me use two different userids. My > primary only had 'normal' access while my secondary user had > full class-A access and was the one listed in RSCS, etc. as > an authorized user. (I was the System's Programming manager > in a small shop and my duties included being the security > manager also.) The auditor received a report of any logons to > that ID so I had to log what function I performed using that userid. > Just like not giving root access to your normal linux id. > > Anyway, you might want to set up a secondary userid for > yourself and such a userid could have been used to pull back > the RSCS messages. > > > Tony Thigpen > > -----Original Message ----- > From: Schuh, Richard > Sent: 08/12/2010 04:18 PM > > Having the operator do anything other than a simple START, > including "PARM anything" requires an approval process. That > said, a scan of the config file reveals that an id that > rarely logs on is authorized. I will use it as my surrogate. > Thanks for the idea. > > > > Regards, > > Richard Schuh > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > >> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > >> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:02 PM > >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > >> Subject: Re: RSCS Messages > >> > >> Force it back to operator by stoping/starting the link > from operator. > >> > >> Based on what I have seen, if the user logs off *AND* RSCS > tries to > >> send another message while the user is logged off, then it reverts > >> back to the operator automatically. > >> > >> Tony Thigpen > >> > >> -----Original Message ----- > >> From: Schuh, Richard > >> Sent: 08/12/2010 12:12 PM > >>> When a user starts a link via SMSG command, it becomes a > >> special pal > >>> of RSCS and receives messages about that link forever or > >> until RSCS is > >>> recycled, whichever comes first. Is there any other way > of causing > >>> RSCS to quit sending the messages? I tried the SETMSG ALL > >> OFF command > >>> and found out that I was not subscribed for any messages :-( > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Richard Schuh > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > >