I have a secondary id;, it is the class G, unauthorized id. 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:29 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: RSCS Messages
> 
> Suggestion time.
> 
> My auditors always had me use two different userids. My 
> primary only had 'normal' access while my secondary user had 
> full class-A access and was the one listed in RSCS, etc. as 
> an authorized user. (I was the System's Programming manager 
> in a small shop and my duties included being the security 
> manager also.) The auditor received a report of any logons to 
> that ID so I had to log what function I performed using that userid.
> Just like not giving root access to your normal linux id.
> 
> Anyway, you might want to set up a secondary userid for 
> yourself and such a userid could have been used to pull back 
> the RSCS messages.
> 
> 
> Tony Thigpen
> 
> -----Original Message -----
>  From: Schuh, Richard
>  Sent: 08/12/2010 04:18 PM
> > Having the operator do anything other than a simple START, 
> including "PARM anything" requires an approval process. That 
> said, a scan of the config file reveals that an id that 
> rarely logs on is authorized. I will use it as my surrogate. 
> Thanks for the idea.  
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Richard Schuh
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> >> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:02 PM
> >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> >> Subject: Re: RSCS Messages
> >>
> >> Force it back to operator by stoping/starting the link 
> from operator.
> >>
> >> Based on what I have seen, if the user logs off *AND* RSCS 
> tries to 
> >> send another message while the user is logged off, then it reverts 
> >> back to the operator automatically.
> >>
> >> Tony Thigpen
> >>
> >> -----Original Message -----
> >>  From: Schuh, Richard
> >>  Sent: 08/12/2010 12:12 PM
> >>> When a user starts a link via SMSG command, it becomes a
> >> special pal
> >>> of RSCS and receives messages about that link forever or
> >> until RSCS is
> >>> recycled, whichever comes first. Is there any other way 
> of causing 
> >>> RSCS to quit sending the messages? I tried the SETMSG ALL
> >> OFF command
> >>> and found out that I was not subscribed  for any messages :-(
> >>>  
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Richard Schuh
> >>>  
> >>>  
> >>>  
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to