z10's were available quite awhile before z/VM 6.1.0 was.  I'd find it hard to 
believe that the z/VM lab didn't have a real z10 to test 6.1.0 on.  I suspect 
there was a time when they emulated a z10 on a z9, but to my knowledge, IBM 
doesn't make that software available to customers.
                                                                                
                                           Dennis

"A slipping sear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least 
expect it.  That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your  unit." 
-- August 1993 issue of PS Magazine, preventive maintenance magazine of the US 
Army


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Les Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 13:37
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10

It's certainly hard to believe that IBM built the hardware and software for a 
z10 *without* fist emulating both in a virtual environment! After all, that's 
what gave VM a renewed life when they tried to kill it... MVS had to have it to 
test new releases.

But, of course, perhaps the necessary configuration wasn't 'ready for prime 
time' :-)

Les

O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
> IBM will sell you a virtual z10.  The virtualization is so good that it
> looks just like a real one.  The price is even the same.
> 
>  
> 
> Seriously, the answer is no.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> Dennis
> 
>  
> 
> "A slipping sear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you
> least expect it.  That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of
> your  unit." -- August 1993 issue of PS Magazine, preventive maintenance
> magazine of the US Army
> 
>  
> 
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:23
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10
> 
>  
> 
> 
> I have just installed z/VM 61 level 2 on a 2094 which I believe is a z9.
> 
> 
> It is not surpiseing that when I try to ipl I get a wait state code of
> 9030 because it does not like the architecture level. 
> 
> I don't suppose there is any way of virtualizing aournd this. 
> 
> 

Reply via email to