It would appear from Googling wait state 9030 and z/vm 6.1, that bit 44, the PFPO bit, of the PSW just needs to be flipped to make z9 impervious to z/VM 6.1. There seems to be considerable interest in the subject..
Edward M Martin <emar...@aultman.com> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 09/21/2010 04:44 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Virtualizing a z10 Hello Les, I suspect that maybe the did just that. Then zapped around the piece they wanted. Seems that Paul Kelly zapped the supervisor to get around something like that back in the 80's. Or was it Dennis Cox? Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-363-5050 ext 35050 -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Les Koehler Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:37 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Virtualizing a z10 It's certainly hard to believe that IBM built the hardware and software for a z10 *without* fist emulating both in a virtual environment! After all, that's what gave VM a renewed life when they tried to kill it... MVS had to have it to test new releases. But, of course, perhaps the necessary configuration wasn't 'ready for prime time' :-) Les O'Brien, Dennis L wrote: > IBM will sell you a virtual z10. The virtualization is so good that it > looks just like a real one. The price is even the same. > > > > Seriously, the answer is no. > > > > > Dennis > > > > "A slipping sear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you > least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of > your unit." -- August 1993 issue of PS Magazine, preventive maintenance > magazine of the US Army > > > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:23 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10 > > > > > I have just installed z/VM 61 level 2 on a 2094 which I believe is a z9. > > > It is not surpiseing that when I try to ipl I get a wait state code of > 9030 because it does not like the architecture level. > > I don't suppose there is any way of virtualizing aournd this. > >
