On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mark Pace <pacemainl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder how much I lose, or overhead gained, by having the other LPAR being > a "gateway" for the 2nd level to the first level resources.
Most obvious one is in availability. When the other LPAR has an outage, your ISFC link to 2nd level goes too. I've never measured the cost of transfer, but might be relevant with very high data volumes. I would expect the 2nd level guest being the biggest cost factor. | Rob
