tyvm, Ray, my HCPCPE AUXVM looks like this:
00001 KRSU05HP SLU UMRSU05 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0802' (AVAILABLE
ON 0802
RSU ON
00002 * LY).
00003 KRSU02HP SLU UMRSU05 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0801' (AVAILABLE
ON 0801
RSU ON
00004 * LY).
Clearly, I have done something wrong.
I did not specify any PPF override for CP.
Where would I look, which $MSGLOG, to see if there was an override.
Ray Waters <ray.wat...@opensolutions.com>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
10/21/2010 09:20 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
George,
Could you maybe have an override PPF for CP?
HCPCPE AUXVM H1 F 80 14 2 6/22/10
2:39:59
HCPCPE TXTRSU20 J1 F 80 40 1 6/22/10
1:51:06
HCPCPE KRSU20HP J1 F 80 2 1 6/22/10
1:50:59
HCPCPE TXTRSU17 J1 F 80 37 1 1/24/10
22:48:43
HCPCPE KRSU17HP J1 F 80 2 1 1/24/10
22:43:47
HCPCPE TXTRSU14 J1 F 80 34 1 10/02/09
14:50:07
HCPCPE KRSU14HP J1 F 80 2 1 10/02/09
14:50:04
HCPCPE AUXVM I1 F 80 8 1 6/05/09
18:43:03
HCPCPE KRSU11HP J1 F 80 2 1 6/05/09
18:13:51
HCPCPE TXTRSU11 J1 F 80 31 1 6/05/09
18:13:51
HCPCPE TXTRSU08 J1 F 80 28 1 3/09/09
22:03:13
HCPCPE KRSU08HP J1 F 80 2 1 3/09/09
22:03:12
HCPCPE TXTRSU05 J1 F 80 25 1 11/25/08
23:06:01
HCPCPE KRSU05HP J1 F 80 2 1 11/25/08
23:06:00
HCPCPE TXTRSU02 J1 F 80 22 1 7/28/08
21:47:41
HCPCPE KRSU02HP J1 F 80 2 1 7/28/08
21:47:40
HCPCPE TEXT O1 F 80 23 1 6/10/08
8:20:14
Here is what my 1002 CP HCPCPE AUXVM H (2A4) looks like:
KRSU20HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '1002' (AVAILABLE ON
1002RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU17HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '1001' (AVAILABLE ON
1001RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU14HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0903' (AVAILABLE ON
0903RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU11HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0902' (AVAILABLE ON
0902RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU08HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0901' (AVAILABLE ON
0901RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU05HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0802' (AVAILABLE ON
0802RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU02HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0801' (AVAILABLE ON
0801RSU ON
* LY).
Ray Waters
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 4:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RSU or PSU?
I notice my CPLOAD $NUCEXEC (See below) with a current Date/Time stamp
shows:
00184 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPE TXTRSU05
Trying to find where HCPCPE TXTRSU05 is and what it contains.
I did 3 P2Ps so all 3 CF's have been updated:
CPLOAD MODULE M1 V 65535 149 2364 2010-10-15
17:54:37
CPLOAD MODULE N1 V 65535 149 2364 2010-10-15
17:54:37
CPLOLD MODULE M1 V 65535 149 2363 2010-10-14
12:05:41
CPLOLD MODULE N1 V 65535 149 2363 2010-10-14
12:05:41
CPLOAD MODULE O1 V 65535 149 2363 2010-10-14
12:05:41
CPLOLD MODULE O1 V 65535 149 2363 2010-10-14
12:05:41
These CF's are from the Level 1 DDR of 540RES.
I have not changed them since.
q mdisk cf1 loc
TargetID Tdev OwnerID Odev Dtype Vol-ID Rdev StartLoc Size
MAINT 0CF1 MAINT 0CF1 3390 54XRES 125B 39 120
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 17:12:19
q mdisk cf2 loc
TargetID Tdev OwnerID Odev Dtype Vol-ID Rdev StartLoc Size
MAINT 0CF2 MAINT 0CF2 3390 54XRES 125B 159 120
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 17:12:23
q mdisk cf3 loc
TargetID Tdev OwnerID Odev Dtype Vol-ID Rdev StartLoc Size
MAINT 0CF3 MAINT 0CF3 3390 54XRES 125B 279 120
CPLOAD $NUCEXEC A1 F 80 Trunc=80 Size=1720 Line=180 Col=1
Alt=0
00180 &1 &2 &3 HCPCNL TEXT
00181 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPA TEXT
00182 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPC TEXT
00183 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPD TEXT
00184 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPE TXTRSU05
00185 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPG TXT32894
00186 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPO TEXT
00187 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPV TEXT
00188 &1 &2 &3 HCPCPW TEXT
00189 &1 &2 &3 HCPCQE TEXT
00190 &1 &2 &3 HCPCQO TEXT
00191 &1 &2 &3 HCPCQT TEXT
00192 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRA TEXT
00193 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRC TEXT
00194 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRL TEXT
00195 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRM TEXT
00196 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRP TEXT
00197 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRR TEXT
00198 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRS TEXT
00199 &1 &2 &3 HCPCRT TEXT
00200 &1 &2 &3 HCPCSE TEXT
Mike Walter <mike.wal...@hewitt.com>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
10/20/2010 05:05 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
George,
If you LINK and ACCESS each of your CF1, CF2, and CF3 disks on 54XRES, and
issue: LISTFILE * MODULE * (ISO
What response do you get? If you see the CPLOAD MODULE with the same date
and time as the IPL message, but still SLU 0802 it may shed more light on
this situation.
And for each CF1, CF2, and CF3 disk, what do you get from: CP QUERY MDISK
CFx LOCation
Mike Walter
Aon Hewitt
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
"George Henke/NYLIC" <george_he...@newyorklife.com>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
10/20/2010 03:54 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
Thank you very much, Alan.
I really did everything by the book, RC=0 on everything including the
PSPs.
I just do not understand why CP still says 0802 for my CPLEVEL.
I looked at $VMFP2P $MSGLOG and $VMFSRV $MSGLOG and everything looks good.
It does not seem that SES even tried to update the CPLEVEL on HCPCPE AUXVM
The IPL shows the old Service Level but the current date/time stamp.
19:09:15 z/VM V5 R4.0 SERVICE LEVEL 0802 (64-BIT)
19:09:16 SYSTEM NUCLEUS CREATED ON 2010-10-14 AT 12:05:41, LOADED
FROM 54XRES
It is the same whether I IPL from CF1 or CF2, but CF3 shows the 2 year old
version.
I did run Service and P2P 3 times once for the RSU, once for the COR for
the 3 z196 compatibility APARs, and finally once again for the PSPs.
I did IPL between the 3 Service sessions.
SERVICE ALL STATUS shows these APARs were applied, built, and PUT2PROD.
service all status vm64798
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing started
VMFSRV1226I CP (5VMCPR40%CP) APAR VM64798 (PTF UM33151) status:
VMFSRV1226I RECEIVED 10/14/10 12:02:44
VMFSRV1226I APPLIED 10/14/10 12:03:24
VMFSRV1226I BUILT 10/14/10 12:06:15
VMFSRV1226I PUT2PROD 10/14/10 12:23:28
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing completed successfully
service all status vm64879
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing started
VMFSRV1226I CP (5VMCPR40%CP) APAR VM64879 (PTF UM33171) status:
VMFSRV1226I RECEIVED 10/14/10 12:02:44
VMFSRV1226I APPLIED 10/14/10 12:03:24
VMFSRV1226I BUILT 10/14/10 12:06:15
VMFSRV1226I PUT2PROD 10/14/10 12:23:28
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing completed successfully
service all status vm64881
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing started
VMFSRV1226I CP (5VMCPR40%CP) APAR VM64881 (PTF UM33183) status:
VMFSRV1226I RECEIVED 10/14/10 12:02:44
VMFSRV1226I APPLIED 10/14/10 12:03:24
VMFSRV1226I BUILT 10/14/10 12:06:15
VMFSRV1226I PUT2PROD 10/14/10 12:23:28
VMFSRV2760I SERVICE processing completed successfully
But that is no assurance that I am running with them.
PTFs did get applied and I do see the correct SES envelop fn's in $MSGLOG,
so I know I did not just rerun with the old SERVLINK.
Is there anyway of mapping CPLOAD so I can be sure that I will really be
IPLing with these APARs when the z196 arrives?.
Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
10/20/2010 04:37 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
On Wednesday, 10/20/2010 at 02:06 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
<george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote:
> The Service Guide talks of a PSU (Product Service Upgrade), not an RSU.
>
> Was this a PSU and not an RSU?
>
> Then why does SHOPZ call it an RSU, even Stacked 5407 RSU?
"PSU" is a *procedure* that you use to apply the Recommended Service
Upgrade (RSU). See Chapter 2 of the Service Guide. (IMO, it doesn't
deserve an abbreviation.)
The term "stacked RSU" is historical. Back in VM/ESA Version 2 the RSU
for each component (CP, CMS, TCP/IP, etc.) was orderable separately in
addition to a "stacked" RSU that contained all of the most recent
component RSUs. In z/VM V3, individual component RSUs were dropped, but
the "stacked" moniker persisted.
My friends in Development will take it under advisement that perhaps it is
time to retire the term "stacked" as it adds no value. "RSU" and "stacked
RSU" are the same thing now days. As a reminder,
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/ is your friend.
Alan Altmark
z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
office: 607.429.3323
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are
deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
NOTICE:
This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by replying to the original message at the listed
email address. Thank You.
