Yes, there are 3. One or two guests uses the 3rd.

 

Derek Ackerman

Enterprise Capacity Planning

& Performance Management

Infocrossing Inc

(206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

 

Do you have more than one real CP?
 
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group

--
 
"Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now,
When?" 
Tom Peters, author of "The Little BIG Things"




 
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:55:45 -0700
> From: derek.acker...@infocrossing.com
> Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> 
> I am simply summing the total CPU times for each CP, for my report I
> keep them separate, here is one example for one CP and one interval.
> 
> 
> CPUADDR=0
> 
> INTERVAL USER CONECTTM CPUVIRT CPUTOTAL
> 
> 19:30:28 AUDITOR 599 0.1750 0.2220
> 19:30:28 DISKACNT 599 0.0150 0.0380
> 19:30:28 EREP 599 0.0000 0.0020
> 19:30:28 FAQSEXEC 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 FAQSVM 599 0.0030 0.0060
> 19:30:28 FTPIFOX 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 FTPSERVE 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 FWER 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 GCS 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 HIDRO 599 33.1660 41.8210
> 19:30:28 IFXSERVE 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 LINMON 599 0.0020 0.0040
> 19:30:28 OPERATOR 599 0.0070 0.0160
> 19:30:28 OPERSYMP 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 OSASF 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 PGAR 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 PHRO 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 RAHM 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 RMCG 599 0.0090 0.0320
> 19:30:28 RMSMASTR 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 RSCS 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SESQ 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SKAN 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SK01 599 0.0050 0.0130
> 19:30:28 SPOOLER 599 0.0000 0.0010
> 19:30:28 SUBMITS 599 0.0020 0.0070
> 19:30:28 SYBCOM 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SYBLOG 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SYBMON 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SYBUSER 599 0.0020 0.0030
> 19:30:28 SYSCHECK 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SYSLOGS 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 SYSTEM 599 0.0000 11.0860
> 19:30:28 TCPIFOX 599 0.0380 0.0550
> 19:30:28 TCPIP 599 0.0070 0.0090
> 19:30:28 TMON 599 0.1720 0.1940
> 19:30:28 TS09 599 0.0740 0.0860
> 19:30:28 UACSERV 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 UAFCSERV 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 UNIJCL 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 UNIPRD2 599 316.9930 401.7960
> 19:30:28 UNIPROD 599 291.7980 302.0340
> 19:30:28 UNITEST 599 0.7500 0.8200
> 19:30:28 VGLIBSRV 599 0.0020 0.0020
> 19:30:28 VMLIB 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 VMSERVR 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 VMSERVS 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 VMSERVU 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 VMUTIL 599 0.0030 0.0050
> 19:30:28 VTAM 599 0.2320 0.3640
> 19:30:28 VTAMOP 599 0.0000 0.0000
> 19:30:28 WMOO 599 0.0000 0.0000
> -------- -------- --------
> INTERVAL 643.4550 758.6160
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
On
> Behalf Of Barton Robinson
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:05 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
> 
> and for linux servers with multiple cpus, you divide cputime by the 
> number of cpus?
> 
> Ackerman, Derek wrote:
> > Yes, and I always divide the CPU time by 1000. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:14 AM
> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> > Subject: Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files
> > 
> > Hopefully you're converting the units. Virtual and Total time are in
> > milliseconds and connect time is in seconds. Are you seeing this
even
> > after converting all of them to the same units?
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ackerman, Derek
> > <derek.acker...@infocrossing.com> wrote:
> >> I always thought that the total VM time, as well as the virtual,
> would
> >> be less than the connect time. Is it normal for the total time to
be
> >> greater than the connect time? This happens a lot...
> >>
> >> Derek Ackerman
> >> Enterprise Capacity Planning
> >> & Performance Management
> >> Infocrossing Inc
> >>
> >> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it,
> may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
> and/or "Protected Health Information," within the meaning of the
> regulations under the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability
Act
> as amended. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient,
you
> are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error,
> and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail,
> including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
> sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may
contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or
"Protected Health Information," within the meaning of the regulations
under the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act as amended.
If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, including
any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete
it from your system. Thank you.



Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain 
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or "Protected Health 
Information," within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance 
Portability & Accountability Act as amended.  If it is not clear that you are 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender 
and delete it from your system. Thank you.

Reply via email to