Sekarang bukannya mereka sudah buat processor buat smartphone? Mungkin terlambat memulai ya.... Kalah saing
On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Fathi Nashrullah <fna...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kan emang udah, dengan XScale-nya. > > Cuman klo ngebandingin sama tawaran Apple buat bikin prosesornya iPhone, > kayaknya kurang pas juga. Coba cek, iPhone generasi pertama akhirnya pake > prosesor buatan siapa? Trus sesignifikan apa perusahaan tersebut saat ini > di dunia prosesor ARM? > > Kalau kata saya sih emang model bisnisnya Intel saat itu ngga sinkron > dengan kecenderungan pasar. Mereka pengen ngembangin platform sendiri (x86 > based) ketimbang membesarkan platform orang lain (ARM Holdings). Kalau > kemudian mereka tergulung pasar, fenomenanya mirip sekali dengan Nokia yang > keukeuh ngga mau pake platform orang (Android), sementara platformnya > sendiri ternyata tak sehebat yang disangka. > > FN > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Arya Mada <arya.m...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','arya.m...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> kalo dulu bener kejadian Intel bikin procie mobile seperti SnapDragon, >> mungkin Qualcomm udah gulung tikar sejak lama ya :) >> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Alvin Tedjasukmana < >> alvin.tedjasukm...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alvin.tedjasukm...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&source=Vox&summary=Intel+didn%27t+take+the+market+for+smartphone+chips+seriously+until+it+was+too+late.&title=Intel+made+a+huge+mistake+10+years+ago.+Now+12%2C000+workers+are+paying+the%26nbsp%3Bprice.&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2F2016%2F4%2F20%2F11463818%2Fintel-iphone-mobile-revolution> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','?subject%5Cx3dFrom+Vox.com:+Intel+made+a+huge+mistake+10+years+ago.+Now+12,000+workers+are+paying+the+price.%5Cx26body%5Cx3dhttp://www.vox.com/2016/4/20/11463818/intel-iphone-mobile-revolution?utm_medium%5Cx3dsocial%5Cx26utm_source%5Cx3demail%5Cx26utm_campaign%5Cx3dvox%5Cx26utm_content%5Cx3dshare:article:top');> >>> >>> Artikel yg lumayan menarik buat dibaca, monggo.... >>> >>> >>> June 6, 2005, seemed to be a triumphant moment for Intel. The chipmaker >>> was already dominating the market for processors that powered Windows-based >>> PCs. Then Steve Jobs took the stage at Apple's World Wide Developers >>> Conference to announce that he was switching the main Windows alternative, >>> Macintosh computers, to Intel chips as well. The announcement cemented >>> Intel's status as the leading company of the PC era. >>> >>> There was just one problem: The PC era was about to end. Apple was >>> already working on the iPhone, which would usher in the modern smartphone >>> era. Intel turned down an opportunity >>> <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/05/paul-otellinis-intel-can-the-company-that-built-the-future-survive-it/275825/> >>> to provide the processor for the iPhone, believing that Apple was unlikely >>> to sell enough of them to justify the development costs. >>> >>> Oops. >>> >>> On Tuesday, Intel announced that it was laying off 12,000 employees >>> <http://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2016/04/intel_quarterly_results.html>, >>> 11 percent of its workforce, the latest sign of the company's struggle to >>> adapt to the post-PC world. Intel still isn't a significant player in the >>> mobile market — iPhones, iPads, and Android-based phones and tablets mostly >>> use chips based on a competing standard called ARM. >>> >>> The company is still making solid profits — it just announced a $2 >>> billion profit >>> <http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/INTC/1917929754x0x886646/374B039B-F62C-4429-99C8-131CA7DE75DF/Earnings_Release_Q1_2016_final.pdf> >>> for the first quarter of 2016. But the company's growth has stalled, and >>> Wall Street is getting worried about its future. >>> >>> Obviously, Intel made a mistake by missing out on the iPhone business. >>> Intel's error in judgment is a classic example of what business guru Clay >>> Christensen calls "disruptive innovation." The term disruption has become >>> so overused in the technology world that it's sometimes treated as a joke. >>> But Christensen gave it a more precise meaning that fits Intel's situation >>> perfectly: a cheap, simple, and less profitable technology that gradually >>> erodes the market for a more established technology. >>> >>> Intel is just the latest in long line of companies that have failed to >>> effectively deal with this kind of disruptive threat. >>> Smartphones are based on a different chip standard than PCs >>> >>> Intel invented a chip standard called x86 that was chosen for the IBM PC >>> in 1981 and became the standard for Windows-based PCs generally. As the PC >>> market soared in the 1980s and 1990s, Intel grew with it. >>> >>> The key to success in the PC business was performance. Chips with more >>> computing power could run more complex applications, complete tasks more >>> quickly, and run more applications at the same time. During the 1990s, >>> Intel and its rivals raced to increase their chips' megahertz ratings — a >>> measure of how many steps the chips could perform in a second. >>> >>> One thing these early chipmakers *didn't* care about was power >>> consumption. Higher-performance chips often consumed more energy, but this >>> didn't matter because most PCs were desktop models plugged into the wall. >>> Even laptops had large batteries and could be plugged in most of the time. >>> >>> But this became a problem in the late 2000s, when the market began to >>> shift to smartphones and tablets. These devices had smaller batteries (to >>> keep the weight down), and users wanted to use them all day on a single >>> charge. Existing x86 chips were a poor fit for these new applications. >>> >>> Instead, these companies turned to a standard called ARM. Created by a >>> once-obscure >>> British company <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture>, it >>> was designed from the ground up for low-power mobile uses. In the >>> mid-2000s, ARM chips weren't nearly as powerful as high-end chips from >>> Intel, but they consumed a lot less power, which was important for >>> smartphones from Apple and BlackBerry. >>> >>> Even better, the ARM architecture is designed for customization. ARM >>> licenses its design to other companies such as Qualcomm and Samsung, which >>> make the actual chips. That provides flexibility that allows smartphone >>> makers to combine a number of different functions on a single chip. And >>> packing a bunch of functions — like data storage and image processing — >>> onto one chip helps to keep power consumption down. >>> Wikipedia / ARM <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Holdings> ARM chip >>> sales, in billions. >>> >>> Today, ARM chips totally dominate the mobile device business. iPhones >>> and iPads run on a chip called the A9 (and predecessors such as the A8 and >>> A7) that are based on the ARM platform, designed by Apple, and manufactured >>> by chipmakers like Samsung <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung> and >>> TSMC <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TSMC>. Most Android-based phones >>> run on ARM-based chips from Samsung, Qualcomm, and other ARM chipmakers. >>> The mobile revolution is leaving Intel behind >>> >>> Intel had not just one but two opportunities to become a major player in >>> the mobile chip market. One was the opportunity to bid on Apple's iPhone >>> business. The other was its ownership of XScale, an ARM-based chipmaker >>> Intel owned until it sold it for $600 million >>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/27/intel_sells_xscale/> in 2006. >>> >>> Intel sold XScale because it wanted to double down on the x86 >>> architecture that had made it so successful. Intel was working on a >>> low-power version of x86 chips called Atom, and it believed that selling >>> ARM chips would signal a lack of commitment to the Atom platform. >>> >>> But Atom chips didn't gain much traction. Intel has made a lot of >>> progress >>> <http://www.androidauthority.com/arm-vs-x86-key-differences-explained-568718/> >>> improving the power efficiency of its Atom chips. But ARM-based chipmakers >>> are experts at building low-power chips, having focused on that task for >>> more than a decade. So they had the early advantage. And at this point, ARM >>> has a huge share of the market. That gives them all of the advantages — >>> more engineers, better software — that come with being a dominant platform. >>> Intel's decline is a classic story of disruptive innovation >>> >>> On one level, you can say that Intel just got unlucky and backed the >>> wrong horse. The chipmaker could have tried harder to win Apple's iPhone >>> contract, and it could have bet on its XScale ARM subsidiary instead of >>> trying to create Atom processors. But it chose not to. >>> >>> But on a deeper level it's not surprising that Intel took the path it >>> did, again because of Christensen's theory of disruptive innovation >>> <http://www.amazon.com/The-Innovators-Dilemma-Revolutionary-Business/dp/0062060244> >>> . >>> >>> Intel's basic problem was that the mobile chip market didn't seem >>> profitable enough to be worth the trouble. Intel had built a sophisticated >>> business around the PC chip. Its employees were experts at building, >>> selling, distributing, and supporting PC chips. This was a lucrative >>> business — often Intel could charge several hundred dollars for its >>> high-end chips — and the company was organized around the assumption that >>> each chip sale would generate significant revenue and profits. >>> >>> Mobile chips were different. In some cases, an entire mobile device >>> could cost less than the price of a high-end Intel processor. With many >>> companies selling ARM chips, prices were low and profit margins were slim. >>> It would have been a struggle for Intel to slim down enough to turn a >>> profit in this market. >>> >>> And in any event, Intel was making plenty of money selling high-end PC >>> chips. There didn't seem to be much reason to fight for a market where the >>> opportunity just didn't seem that big. >>> >>> What this analysis missed, of course, was that the mobile market would >>> eventually become vastly larger than the PC market. ARM-based chipmakers >>> might make a much smaller profit *per chip,* but the market was >>> destined to grow to many billions of chips per year. Even a small profit >>> per chip multiplied by billions of chips could add up to a big opportunity. >>> >>> Meanwhile, Intel had to worry that jumping wholeheartedly into low-power >>> mobile chips would undermine demand for its more lucrative desktop chips. >>> What if companies started buying Intel's cheap mobile chips and putting >>> them in laptops? That could hurt Intel's bottom line more than the added >>> mobile revenue would help it. >>> >>> Obviously, Intel's leadership now recognizes that they made a mistake. >>> They're now so far behind that it's going to be a struggle to gain a >>> foothold in the new market. And as cheap mobile chips get more and more >>> powerful, we can expect more and more companies to put them into low-end >>> laptop and desktop computers, eroding demand for Intel's more expensive and >>> power-hungry chips. >>> Chipmakers are doing to Intel what Intel once did to Digital Equipment >>> Corporation >>> >>> Ironically, Intel is now suffering the same fate that it inflicted on an >>> earlier generation of computing innovators three decades ago. In the 1980s, >>> there was a thriving community of "minicomputer" makers led by a company >>> called the Digital Equipment Corporation. >>> >>> These washing machine–size minicomputers were only "mini" compared to >>> the room-size mainframe computers that preceded them, and they cost tens of >>> thousands of dollars. >>> >>> Early PCs based on Intel chips were referred to as microcomputers, and >>> companies like DEC dismissed them as toys. They did this for exactly the >>> same reasons Intel dismissed the mobile market — selling a $2,000 PC was a >>> lot less profitable than selling a $50,000 minicomputer, and DEC didn't >>> expect PCs to be a big enough market to be worth the effort. >>> >>> Of course, that turned out to be totally wrong. The PC market turned out >>> to be vastly larger than the minicomputer market, just as the mobile market >>> is now much larger than the PC market. But by the time this became clear, >>> it was too late. DEC and most of its peers were forced out of business by >>> the end of the 1990s. >>> >>> >>> Sumber: >>> >>> http://www.vox.com/2016/4/20/11463818/intel-iphone-mobile-revolution >>> >>> -- >>> =========== >>> Saksikan drone Telkomsel dari Sabang hingga Merauke melalui video >>> streaming interaktif selama 30 hari di >> tsel.me/elangnusa #ElangNusa >>> >>> --------------------- >>> Toko Headphone & Earphone Terlengkap dan Terbaru >>> Kunjungi >> http://bassaudio.net >>> ---------------------- >>> Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan >>> ----------------------- >>> FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id >>> >>> Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT >>> >>> ========== >>> --- >>> Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "[id-android] >>> Indonesian Android Community" di Google Grup. >>> Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, >>> kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','id-android%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');> >>> . >>> Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent thru my PC >> Powered by Andromax M2Y 4G LTE >> >> -- >> =========== >> Saksikan drone Telkomsel dari Sabang hingga Merauke melalui video >> streaming interaktif selama 30 hari di >> tsel.me/elangnusa #ElangNusa >> >> --------------------- >> Toko Headphone & Earphone Terlengkap dan Terbaru >> Kunjungi >> http://bassaudio.net >> ---------------------- >> Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan >> ----------------------- >> FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id >> >> Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT >> >> ========== >> --- >> Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian >> Android Community" di Google Grup. >> Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, >> kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','id-android%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');> >> . >> Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android. >> > > -- > =========== > Saksikan drone Telkomsel dari Sabang hingga Merauke melalui video > streaming interaktif selama 30 hari di >> tsel.me/elangnusa #ElangNusa > > --------------------- > Toko Headphone & Earphone Terlengkap dan Terbaru > Kunjungi >> http://bassaudio.net > ---------------------- > Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan > ----------------------- > FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id > > Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT > > ========== > --- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian > Android Community" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','id-android%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');> > . > Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android. > -- ------------------------------------------------------- @darma78 | *dikirim pake Aluminium* -- =========== Saksikan drone Telkomsel dari Sabang hingga Merauke melalui video streaming interaktif selama 30 hari di >> tsel.me/elangnusa #ElangNusa --------------------- Toko Headphone & Earphone Terlengkap dan Terbaru Kunjungi >> http://bassaudio.net ---------------------- Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan ----------------------- FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT ========== --- Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian Android Community" dari Google Grup. Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android.
