> So, this wg decided that we will use one and only one matching rule, > just like we decided to use only one character set. Both of these > (the rule and the charset) are created in the Unicode Consortium.
The decision of use one and only one matching rule is at false, because of there is no ONE rule can deal with hundreds of different scripts no matter how strong it appears that you defend the stand. The charset appears in the form of a table, which gives us a better view of these chars and we have a base to work with. But when you try to use only ONE rule to deal with all of the chars, the rule has to be bias for only one type of script, currently Latin. If we let this pass from this IDN wg, then all of us here are arguing for nothing, as the "Prohibit CDN code points" is the only way out suggested by Kenny Huang. Isn't the time for the WG to wake up from the "one rule for all" scope? The only way out is to use multiple rules to treat multiple scripts, where each rule is identified by a tag. Liana
