On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:52 AM Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:
> > >> I think a checkpoint / review is a good goal for the group. > >> > > > > This seems like something reasonable and easy to add. > > > > Any objections? > > I’m fine if the revision to best practices is scoped to the replay > problem. This was presented to dispatch as a narrowly scoped problem > statement, and the rechartering result was decided on that basis. If this > were to evolve into a “let’s think about DKIM best practices” more > generally, it will get bogged down. > I've synthesized the feedback to date into a new update to the charter text. It calls out the order of operations the group seems to prefer, and makes explicit the possible output of a "best practices" update. Let me know if this is a step in the right direction or the wrong one. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/ Note that the next IESG telechat with room on it won't be until the new year at this point, so this won't advance before then. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
