It is legitimate, but not very logical. To base arguments, or suppositions, on any "draft" document leaves you wide open for error. Rodney H. Kay -----Original Message----- From: Lee, Jiwoong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 10:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: An Internet Draft as reference material Dear all What do you think about "de facto" that many technical documents are currently using Internet Drafts as referece material? I've seen next two cases: 1. An Internet Draft refers to another Internet Draft. 2. A book refers to another Internet Draft. I'm not sure of the next case. Any body observed this? 3. An RFC refers to an Internet Draft. Hereby I'd like to ask your opinion, esp. on no.1 Is it legitimate? Cheers, Jiwoong Lee KT M.com
- IETF vs Books Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Grenville Armitage
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Rosen, Brian
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material John Day
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Robert Elz
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Kay, Rodney
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Robert Elz
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Scott Bradner
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Robert Elz
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material John Stracke