> Even so, we as an organization have NO claim on the future of the "Internet > Architecture", whatever that is. I strongly disagree. IETF essentially "owns" the Internet Protocol specification and has change control over it. > A small group individuals with a cute idea can have dramatic impact, > no matter what the IETF thinks. Witness WWW and NAT. no argument that such a group can have "dramatic impact" (for good or ill) but that's not the same thing as changing the architecture. a bomb can have a dramatic impact on a building also. but when a building is bombed, we don't use the word "architecture" to refer to the rubble. Keith
- "redesign[ing] the architecture of the... Sean Doran
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Keith Moore
- Re: "redesign[ing] the archit... Dave Crocker
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Eliot Lear
- Re: "redesign[ing] the archit... Keith Moore
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Vernon Schryver
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Vernon Schryver
- Re: "redesign[ing] the archit... Keith Moore
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Eliot Lear
- Re: "redesign[ing] the archit... Keith Moore
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: "redesign[ing] the archit... Keith Moore
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... Bob Braden
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architectu... narakamath