Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the IETF meetings ? The Next Generation IPv8 Internet has that. Why is the IPv4 Internet stuck in the stone ages ?
All of the technology is in place and Address Space is FREE. 2047 IPv8 Blocks have been FREEly allocated to IN-ADDR.<TLD> managers. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt On October 25, 2001 Microsoft will launch Windows XP which supports IPv8 Addressing. Companies like New.Net are making it possible for people to register IN-ADDR.<TLD> names. Companies like TuCows are helping to break down the .COM monopoly with .INFO names. http://www.IN-ADDR.INFO The .BIZ Community is growing. It is time to build a new Internet based on fair IP allocations. The Proof-of-Concept work on the IPv4 Internet can continue, but true pioneers need to move on. The technology is now in place to route around the I* organizations, "It Seeks Overall Control". http://www.dot-biz.com/Registry/ProofConcept/index.html Do you use a 2002:<IPv4>:0000 prefix ? http://www.dot-arizona.com/IPv8/IPv4/ http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.unir.com http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Resnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:24 AM Subject: Re: participation in IETF meetings > On 10/23/01 at 9:49 AM -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote: > > >Many have been the meetings where folks who want to actively > >participate in that meeting are unable to get in or unable to sit > >down. > > I'm sorry, but I really think this is a problem with the > person/persons chairing the meeting. If you are the chair of a > working group whose meeting room is too small, you've got some > choices: > > 1. If this happened in the past, you need to ask for a bigger meeting > room. However, I understand this is not always possible. > > 2. Before your WG meeting, ask on the mailing list (which all active > participants should be reading anyway) for all people who are > planning on attending the meeting and actively participating to send > you a piece of e-mail. Count. When you get to the room at the > meeting, count off that many seats in the front rows. Add 10 for > useful IESG/IAB members. Add a bunch if you know your WG is going to > have cross-area interest where some people will be attending who > don't subscribe to the WG list. Cordon off the section with some > paper signs which read "ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS ONLY". No, it won't stop > everyone, but it will help things. > > 3. If people are blocking the door during the meeting, be a traffic > cop. Go to the door and say, "If you are staying, move in to the > opposite side of the room away from the door. Otherwise, leave." The > area behind where the chair usually sits is a fine place to stick > people. If it gets totally out of hand, you may have to conduct the > meeting by standing in the door; people who are just loafing hate > sitting right next to the chairperson anyway. > > 4. (Up on soapbox again) Do not allow lecture-style presentations in > your WG meeting, or at the very least do not let anyone present > introductory material which could be posted to the list. These kinds > of things encourage people to come to the meeting to try to learn. > That's not why we're having these meetings. There should be NO NEW > INFORMATION presented at WG meetings. If at least an introduction to > the topic has not been written up and posted to the list, discussion > of that topic should not be allowed in the WG meeting. The content of > a WG meeting should be without surprise. > > Personally, I think this is a fine idea for BOFs too: You're posting > an agenda before the meeting anyway; make sure any needed information > is written up and posted before the meeting and make sure that the > agenda has URLs for that information. Now, I understand that BOFs are > in a somewhat different position and sometimes there's going to have > to be presentation of new material in BOF meetings, but that needn't > always be the case. WGs, of course, have no excuse. > > pr > -- > Pete Resnick <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102 >
