Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:38:04 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] I believe the only safe implementation of RENAME is one that creates a new mailbox, copies all messages to that new mailbox, and then deletes the source mailbox. The client can do that just as easily as the server.
This doesn't work if the server is maintaining other metadata with the mailbox, such as mailbox level annotations. I believe that RENAME can't be fixed, and should be removed. I believe that the reference argument to LIST can't be fixed. Will you join me in lobbying to remove it? Larry
