+1 for WG adoption The document will need some review though (cfr Brian's valid point below)
-éric On 25/07/2018, 05:38, "Int-area on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <int-area-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 for adoption. However, I am a bit concerned about this key recommendation: > Application developers SHOULD NOT develop applications that rely on > IPv6 fragmentation It isn't obvious to me that this is an algorithmic requirement. If the application runs over TCP, how does the developer ensure that TCP will use an MSS that avoids the need for fragmentation? (The UDP situation is a bit clearer, but RFC8085 introduces considerable complexity, unless we accept that the Internet MTU for UDP is 576 or 1280.) Regards Brian _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area