> > e2e, and noting that many implementations do in fact drop a datagram > that they can't immediately forward due to the implied ddos on the > network if they don't, this means that there is some probability that > a TCP session between systems aggressively using privacy addresses > could easily only get a SYN-ACK response to the third SYN,
Yes. Can you clarify what is it exactly that you are suggesting then? Or are you saying that you want the switch-based approach? Can I go read about your proposal somewhere? Jari _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
