On 10/1/07, Danny McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > MUST is the directive to implementers of this specification, and is > > appropriate (I didn't check, but presumably it is paired with "MUST be > > ignored on receipt"). > > I did look for that, didn't recall seeing it (or any other error > handling, etc.., for that matter).
I've added that. What other error handling do you think might be useful to define? Alia
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
