Bernard Aboba wrote: >> But let's have a fair evaluation. If we decide that PANA fits the >> requirements perfectly, the above objections apply equally well to it. > > Actually, I'm not clear that the objections apply equally well to PANA. > > On the Windows platform at least, there is an API that permits > integration of new EAP lower layers. That means that PANA support can > be added by a third party with no required changes to the operating system.
On Windows 98? And even the answer is "yes", I don't think we can realistically expect many organizations to write new code for 98 at this time. > Since DHCP/EAP requires change to the DHCP state machine, the work > required would be considerably greater. Yes. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
