On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 03:45:16PM +0100, Mark Townsley wrote: > > Back to the issue at hand, I see no technical reason why EAP in DHCPv6 > would not work in largely the same fashion as the proposed EAP in > DHCPv4. I doubt the authors have any aversion at all to specifying this > in detail, with the help of the IETF to ensure that it is done correctly.
On the other hand, since both DHCPv6 and PANA requires an IP address to operate, I don't see a reason why IETF needs to re-invent the wheel to carry EAP over IP. I think this is one important factor to understand why people are so concerned with EAP/DHCPv4 proposal. Yoshihiro OHba > > As for IPv6 deployment for DSL, I will be raising this at the > architecture group session and plenary during the next quarterly DSL > Forum meeting in the hopes of spurring more active development and > deployment. > > - Mark > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Int-area mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
