Joe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:43 AM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: Thierry Ernst; Internet Area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Why the IETF is still working on > providing newfeaturesto IPv4 ? > > > > Templin, Fred L wrote: > >>> I think that depends on what you mean by "IPv6 deployment". > >>> IMHO, IPv6 deployment as endpoint identifiers is a MUST but > >>> disruption of the IPv4 Internet is a SHOULD NOT. > >> Agreed that IPv4 must not be disrupted. > > > > OK. > > > >> What I meant to say is really all the work items for providing new > >> features to IPv4. Example in the IPv4 mobility area. > > > > Clearly, I disagree. IMHO, IPv6 as endpoint identifiers > > and IPv4 in-the-network is the right fit for growing > > the Internet; see for example the RRG work. > > See it indeed. > > See the open questions list. See what open questions aren't there. > > See which open questions are classic distributed-systems > show-stoppers. > See which missing open questions are too. > > Then decide whether "right fit" is a conclusion.
You are good at twisting words, but see the "IMHO" and see the "for example" portions of my message before diverting the discussion as a platform for tangential commentary. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Joe > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
