Joe Touch wrote:
Pars Mutaf wrote:
With all due respect, I'm questioning this result ;-) The
client/server paradigm which, at least to me, does not really
require IPv6.
The charts are intended to show the uptake of IPv6 commercially. Web
servers seem a reasonable way to measure that, at least initially.
In my opinion the real dooms day metric is "how far we are from the
IP addressable cell phone", which is probably not measurable :-/
Nor would an ATM addressable cellphone be, unless they talk to
something else using IPv6. Using IPv6 internally is irrelevant.
I would be surprised if IPv6 made it into cellphones and major
companies failed to upgrade their web servers to be surf-able from
those phones.
Things may not always go hand in hand. IPv6 cellphones _have_ been
spotted: stack, jvm and browser included (not sure about flashplayer).
I'm wondering what precisely technical problem do the companies' web
servers encounter to not support IPv6 http.
Alex
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
