Tex,
It is not only the speed but more important the human interface . Example
to change settings of a device I must take more steps.
I have mentioned that already in November
If you want I will send you a more complete report.
regards Hans
----- Forwarded by Hans Heger/RIVM/NL on 24-05-2006 16:53 -----
Hans
Heger/RIVM/NL
To
21-11-2005 13:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: [Dartware #41707] snmp reading
problemen snmp-cisco(2v2) probe
(Document link: Hans Heger)
I don’t know what the basis is of the decision to fade out traditional
Server versus traditional
I find both versions indispensable for the following reasons:
I develop a map’s on traditional using my desk and monitoring / and
testing en developing.
Traditional give more speed and the better user interface using traditional
is very important, it really speeds up testing en developing maps.
I am planning to use server is more fore common use en monitoring campus
wide on a longer time base. Now I use a MacOS9 9. Imac 4.2.4 for the job.
With regards Hans Heger RIVM
Server versus traditional
I find both versions indispensable for the following reasons:
I develop a map’s on traditional using my desk and monitoring / and
testing en developing.
Traditional give more speed and the better user interface using traditional
is very important, it really speeds up testing en developing maps.
I am planning to use server is more fore common use en monitoring campus
wide on a longer time base. Now I use a MacOS9 9. Imac 4.2.4 for the job.
With regards Hans Heger RIVM
|-------------------------------------->
| Tex Clayton |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Sent by: |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
| |
| 24-05-2006 16:36 |
| |
| |
| Please respond to |
| "InterMapper Discussion" |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
|-------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
To|
| "InterMapper Discussion" <[email protected]>
|
|
cc|
|
|
|
Subject|
| Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder
|
|
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On May 24, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Hans Heger wrote:
> I have contacted other users and I am not standing alone in de idea
> that
> the new interface is a step backwards. It works more slowly
> because the
> users have to take more steps to change something.
Please give us detailed feedback describing what you find frustrating/
slow, as well as the hardware, OS version, and Java version that the
client is running on.
-Tex Clayton
Dartware, LLC
http://www.dartware.com
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
