Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote:
TK> The another question is whether this document needs to be WG
TK> document or not. As it seems to be that we are updating the
TK> RFC5996 and obsoleting stuff from it, there seemed to be some
TK> people who felt that this should be WG document. Send your
TK> comments about this too.if it can fit into the charter, and/or our AD will let us, then yes. -- Michael Richardson -on the road-
pgp4Y4prhnPQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
