For the most part, agree with all of your points of clarification; thanks. One item for further discussion:
Brian Haberman wrote:
Long period of time, perhaps, but how long is difficult to quantify. Again, perhaps this is a question for the [BAKER] renumbering draft.
I think it is quite pertinent to this draft. How long must an
address remain stable in order to satisfy this document's stability
goal?
I think this question is going to be very much dependent on the use case scenarios. For example, in the future we may see deeply-networked homes in which we will have long-lived sessions, such as playing a 3hr video between the DVD player and home theater system. Indeed, there may be "always-on" sessions such as the home-security system monitoring intrusion-detection sensors around the house.
On the other end of the spectrum, we will have highly-mobile environments, e.g., a vehicle that visits different Internet access points (and receives different prefix advertisements) every five miles or so it travels down the road.
So, where do we draw the line?
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
