Michel Py wrote: > Note that p2p is not that unfriendly as of now. I just had a look at one > of the pieces of p2p I use at home; there are some 230k users on the ^^^ > server I connect to, ^^^^^^ And the inconsistency with that statement is ???
> plus a load of other ones with 100k+ users. Some of > the files have 500+ simultaneous sources. These guys are not all network > geeks, and a fair number have broadband and are behind NATs or behind > some kind of a firewall (I ran a few probes). It means that the point > where Joe-six-pack that bought a $50 NAT box is able to type > "http://192.168.1.1", figure out that the password is "admin" and use > the web interface to open the one port that the p2p app needs open has > been reached. Out of the million something users I see right now on > _one_ p2p app, I'd be damned if there are not 100k Joes and Janes that > don't understand squat about networks but that spent the time to read > what they had to do in order to get free pr0n, warez or free mp3s. If it > has reached that kind of mass acceptance, it must be easy enough. > > Michel. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------