and do not say anything about the fee scruture except it has to
be low cost, it would be a much more swallable pill.
- Alain.
Bob Hinden wrote:
Geoff,
After thinking about this and looking at the evident need to make some progress
here I'd like to believe that this level of resolution of potential ambiguity
is adequate, given that there is always the option to use a central registry draw to
obtain a global id that is assuredly unique.
My other issues with the current rev of the draft are still on the table, and of course
I'd be happy to work with the authors to come up with some revised words that may find
some reasonable (rough) wg consensus, and still remain within the overall spirit
and intent of this proposal.
Thanks. That would be very helpful. I will contact you off list and see if we can get together to come with some wording that could be presented to the w.g. during the Thursday session.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
