Alain Durand wrote: >Tim Chown wrote: >>I think we will see a lot of people using fd00::/48 or fd00::/64 for >>their sites/links purely becuase it's less effort to type. >> >If this is the case, what will we have gained from fec0::/48?
The opportunity to avoid this numbering clash. Idiots who use fd00::/48 will clash with each other, but the rest of us avoid clashes with each other and with the idiots. -zefram -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
