Tim Chown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:03:44AM +0200, EricLKlein wrote: > > > > The list of IPv6 plus NAT is over 140 documents long, with many of them > > being proposed in the last 5 days. The look up list I ran is: > > http://search.ietf.org/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=htdig&restrict=http%3A%2F%2Fw > > ww.ietf.org%2Finternet-drafts%2F&exclude=&matchesperpage=50&method=and&forma > > t=builtin-long&sort=time&words=%2Bnat+%2BIPv6 > > So I google for "green cow" and get a million hits... but there are very > few green cows out there... > > People will use IPv6 with NAT, but then they may as well stick with IPv4+NAT. >
This may be true, but no one is proposing green cow become an IETF standard. The list I provided is recently proposed IETF drafts on when and how to use NAT with IPv6. If there are this many new drafts coming out in November 2003, even with a WG decision to not do NAT IPv6 then there should be a big red flag that there is a disconnect between what this WG says and what others are doing. Eric -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
