On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:44:12PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Tony Hain wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > ... > > > Now, I would be completely happy for us to throw away the Hain/Templin > > > draft as long as we immediately standardize the Hinden/Haberman solution. > > > But if we want to address (pun intended) the problems of the real world, > > > we cannot ignore the fact that most corporate network managers are > > > profoundly convinced of the need for private addressing. > > > > In many cases I would agree with Brian, but in this specific one we have an > > example of lost discussion from many years ago about why network managers > > 'need' a private space, and FEC0 was allocated for it. We need to document > > why Hinden/Haberman is needed to solve today's problems, so we don't end up > > arguing about it 5 years from now. > > If you know the result in advance, why bother to write a > requirements/goals document?
You seem to want such documents a lot when you're wearing your v6ops hat :) Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
