>>>>> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:04:26 -0800, "Shawn A. Routhier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
>>> 1) The description field for the ipAddressEntry object is simply >>> ridiculously short: >>> "inet addr entry" Shawn> As the editor I thought the description for the table object Shawn> (ipAddressTable) covered the entry object as well and therefore Shawn> repeating the same text would not be useful. Do you think there Shawn> is something else that should be added to the description of Shawn> the entry that isn't in the description of the table? "Internet address entry" would have been better. As is, it just appears as if the author was in a huge hurry. Have about: "An address mapping for a particular interface."? >>> 2) Was there every discussion about making this table writable? ... >> I don't recall this specific topic being discussed. Shawn> As with Brian I don't recall this specific topic being Shawn> discussed. Well, then my next question would then be: Is it too late to do this? It would basically just mean: 1) making ipAddressIfIndex, ipAddressType, & ipAddressPrefix MAX-ACCESS clauses read "read-create". 2) Adding a new column: "ipAddressRowStatus" of type RowStatus. 3) Maybe changing the conformance statements to allow the optionality of the writable aspect of it. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
