[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > my proposal: > define NI_UDP as replacement of NI_DGRAM. deprecate NI_DGRAM (keep > it as an alias to NI_UDP is okay). define NI_SCTP, NI_DCCP and such. > these three are mutually exclusive, and if more than one is specified > it would cause EAI_FAIL.
And define NI_TCP, which is also the default if none is specified? I'd also propose deprecating the default, to get everyone in the habit of specifying something. -- Andrew White -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
