> If I am not wrong, if we wanted the router to send the correct > prefix to the host in the ICMP message, we will have to change > the format of the ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable message. > > Currently, we just have 4 bytes unused in the message format and > this prefix can't fit in there. > > So the question is: is it worth changing the format of the message > for this optimization ??
Probably not. Having the proper code is a really nice first step. -- Christian Huitema -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
