Is it only I that find it odd that talking about Multicast DNS is viewed to be in-scope for this document, while talking about the applicability issues for the addresses *defined by this document* is stated to be out of scope??
Erik > > For future study names with Local IPv6 addresses may be resolved > > inside of the site using dynamic naming systems such as Multicast > > DNS. > > > >==> this seems irrelevant and should be removed; above, it already > >states someting general about local naming systems. > > I don't see it doing any harm either. > >==> Add to disadvantages: > > > > - Instead of using global unicast addresses inside the sites, the > > sites may be tempted to start using Local IPv6 addresses excessively, > > instead of using global unicast addresses and reachability restrictions > > such as firewalls or access control lists > > I think this is out of scope for this document. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
