On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:27:04AM -0800, Alain Durand wrote: > > Bill, > > This is exactly what the local addr draft is all about with the current > text that makes > allocation permanent. > > As a side note, the document talks about allocations, not delegations. > > - Alain.
OK, but I think we can have some statement to say that there is a tradeoff when you reuse previous temporary allocations because such reuse may lead to ambiguity. With 1,000 billion /48's available under a /8 you have a lot of capacity before you need to re-allocate. You could say that "returns" should not be reused until those 1,000 billion /48's have been allocated from under the FC00::/8 prefix? (Though that would be a kind of excuse for sites to not pay recurrent registration fees :) Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
