>Dear ADs, consider this mail as my second step in the appeal chain. > >Specifically, the part I object to are: > >- under the FD00::/8 prefix (Locally assigned): > using the 'all zero' pattern instead of random bits would have the >exact same effect > as using the 'site local' address: it would create ambiguous >addresses. The ipv6 > wg spend over a year deprecating 'site local' addresses for that >reason. It is the duty > of this wg to document that using that particular pattern can be >harmful. > >-under the FC00::/8 prefix (Centrally assigned:) > the document says that: >" The requirements for centrally assigned global ID allocations are: > - Available to anyone in an unbiased manner. > - Permanent with no periodic fees. > - Allocation on a permanent basis, without any need for renewal > and without any procedure for de-allocation."
i support Alain 100%. itojun -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------