On 2004-03-01, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > I don't see the need for any change on this in rfc2462bis.
Okay, no worries, I'm happy too: I had assumed the DIID behaviour was widespread. >[...] In this particular case, "A" is a > CGA identifier, so it cannot equal to a normal EUI-64 identifier. I had not thought of this! So it is not a problem at all. In that case I'm entirely happy to go with just raising SHOULD to MUST and deleting the text explaining DIID. Sorry to have wasted your time ... -----Nick -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
