To summarize the points, I'd propose to do nothing on this in rfc2462bis because:
- the actual odds of the problem in the real world should be very low, even in the current status. - if we take the proposed change in rfc2462bis, the odds will be getting lower and lower. - if we add something for this to rfc2462bis, the protocol will become complicated, degrading one of the motivations of this clarification.
From the SEND point of view, looks good.
--Pekka Nikander
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
