Hi Ralph, > John - I agree that "the goal of 2462(-bis) is STATELESS ADDRESS > AUTOCONFIG." However, the bits controlling use of stateless/stateful are > also defined in RFC 2462bis, so RFC 2462bis goes a little beyond just > defining how stateless address autoconfig. Invoking the camel's nose > principle, and striving for clarity, I would suggest that it would be > appropriate for RFC 2462bis to explicitly define the > stateful protocol as RFC 3315, with an informative reference to RFC 3315.
I have no problem with 2462-bis saying that Stateless Address Autoconfiguration is DHCPv6, with an Informative Ref to 3315. This seems like a truth in advertising point. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
