> The network architect/engineer/admin (customer) community should be > considered here, as well. Are there any customers that have said "DHCPv6 PD > is too complex, we want something simpler"? I haven't heard from any. That's too much saying. If delegation of ``prefix'' to CPE is not needed (i.e. only address assignment to the 1st hop CPE device is only requir- ed), DHCPv6 PD is too much. # In case of this, use ``RA + DAD'' ?
If you assume the case to delegate prefix, DHCPv6 PD may be the solution. wataru # Sorry to say, IPv4 is still attrative for me. # Also, IPv4 PPP is still attractive for me. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
