> > => I think it's a bad signal, _if_ detected. I.e. An average > > user is not even going to know that they have 100% link > > utilisation. And _if_ they do, I actually think that neither > > the user, nor the help desk first line of support will > > have the faintest idea (having been a regular with help > > desk people that work for a couple of major operators > > in different countries). > > The user knows that all of his communication attempts fail. > That's a > good signal that there's something wrong. If the user knows nothing > more of this, he calls helpdesk or some support, which may > be able to > identify the problem and eliminate it.
=> "may" is the key word. I basically don't believe it. I think it'll be problematic enough to be always disabled. > > Maybe the shop knows something about how the device operates -- they > certainly should! -- => Maybe shops in your vicinity employ technicians to sell this stuff but I certainly _never_ saw a shop assistant who knows anymore than the text on the box. or you read documentation, which should > certainly > describe this feature. => I don't think you understant what an "average user" means. It means, get the box, plug it in, it works! I know people that struggle with connecting a DVD to the TV....let's be realistic. > For the average user, it doesn't have to be more intuitive than that, > right? He only cares whether it works or not. In the first place > 99.9% of people wouldn't be plugging these boxes in > triangles => I disagree with making assumptions about what deployment scenarios will be like in the next 5-7 years. Thus, I disagree with your premise about 99.9 % of scenarios. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
