-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2004-04-09, at 07.19, Dan Lanciani wrote: > > |=> At least you and I agree FWIW :) > |Perhaps I missed this discussion, but I can't see > |why they should be put in the global DNS. > > One might want to build an overlay network where consenting sites know > how > to reach each other by constructing dynamic tunnels based on some (yet > to > be defined) mapping function. Thus the addresses may well be > reachable in > some sense. But is this reason enough to have them in the global DNS tree. I don't think so... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQHZrMqarNKXTPFCVEQKaNwCgr1wxXw9gKrSnJI90AavKMkWdgRoAn2x8 WwLoQEN9JrytIhMRArA+QgIO =wLwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
