My biggest question is: can we recycle rfc2462bis as DS despite fact 3?I failed to see what is wrong with the unused feature elimination Christian described when moving along the standard track. - Alain.
On Apr 26, 2004, at 10:09 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... john . loughney
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Christian Huitema
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need t... Brian Haberman
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether w... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whet... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... Brian Haberman
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether w... Brian Haberman
- Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc24... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-r... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉