This issue is open and there will be a resolution sent very soon. The text was meant to be for another issue (relaxing the protocol constants for the frequency of RAs).
Hesham > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 9:42 AM > To: Soliman Hesham > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [psg.com #257] Eliminate random delay in RA transmission > > > Hi Hesham, > > Soliman Hesham wrote: > > Very sorry for the confusion. This text belongs > > to a different issue. Eliminating the random > > delay is NOT rejected. > > I'm a bit confused now, > > What's the staus of this issue, and what's the context? > > > Greg > > =========================================================== This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. =========================================================== -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
