Hello,
Thanks for the comment, and sorry for not responding sooner.
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:40:09 -0700,
>>>>> "Barany, Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I noticed in Section 5.4.2 "Sending Neighbor Solicitation Messages" that
> MLD (RFC 2710) is referenced (and correctly so). Subsequently,
> MLD-snooping switches are briefly mentioned. It might be beneficial to
> also reference RFC 3590 here (which updates RFC 2710). Thnx.
I think it's a valid suggestion since RFC3590 mentions the exact issue
of interaction between RFC2462 and MLD. I'll add a reference to
RFC3590 as an informative one in the next revision of the draft.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
