>>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:52:45 +1000, >>>>> Greg Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'd like to be sure that's what we're doing though, by > explicitly stating that in the draft (or at least documenting > behaviours in such a case). Same here. Please refer to the next message of mine http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg03353.html and let's make a consensus. I showed my own weak preference, but I'm quite open to other ideas. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
