>>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:40:59 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> So the question is:
>> In your opinion (no reasoning please), the rate limiting
>> configuration per-interface in the ICMPv6 spec should be a
>> 1) SHOULD
>> 2) MAY
>> 3) Any of them is fine for you.
>> My choice is 3.
> I prefer 3, then 2. I would not take option 1.
Oops, sorry, I was not careful enough...I mistakenly understood that
option 3 was "neither of them (i.e., no RFC2119 keyword)".
Please let me correct my previous answer to:
My choice is 2.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
